A source drops a strong claim
Someone sends you a statistic that would make the piece. Before you publish it, you have to decide how much it can be trusted — on your own, against the clock, with no desk to hand it to.
The problem, in practice
Confident words, thin receipts
An article asserts a lot in its own voice, yet the sources it points to are sparse, tangential, or missing entirely. Checking each assertion by hand is slow and quietly soul-crushing.
Getting it wrong costs more than a correction
Your name, your readers’ trust, and everything you published before it. There is no fact-checking desk between you and the mistake — and verifying every claim in every piece, alone, is more than one person can sustain over the arc of a normal week.
What we are building
Drop in a link and our tool would surface the claims inside that article, then trace each one back to what it actually cites, so you can judge how solid the ground under it is. We are building this now, and we are not shipping it yet.
This page is a waitlist. Join it and we’ll let you know when Veri News opens to a first group.
Roadmap
None of this is available yet. These are the capabilities we are building toward.
- Planned: paste a link and have the article’s claims laid out individuallyNot yet available
- Planned: for each claim, see the source material it points to and how far it actually reachesNot yet available
- Planned: keep a running log of the articles you have checked, with the reasoning at handNot yet available
- Planned: flag moments where a claim leans on weaker evidence than its wording suggestsNot yet available